Daang Matuwid

Ineptocracy (in-ep-toc’-ra-cy) – A system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.

The Woman At The Riverbank

I remember a story by Anthony De Melo, recounting as much as I can, it goes like this:

Two monks come before a river and spot a young and pretty lady about to cross it. However, the current was too strong and the woman fears she wont make it on her own.

The first monk offered to carry her on his back, much to the profuse protests of the second monk. Having safely crossed, the lady thanked the first monk and went on her way.

The second monk continued to chastise the first monk for the deed, saying it violated their sacred oath never to touch a woman. This went on for a few more miles and hours into their journey. The first monk never said a word and seemed to be unstirred even with all the scoldings. After sometime, and out of utter frustration for having been ignored all this time, the second monk told the first monk:

“Your indiscretion and violation of our sacred oath makes you unworthy to garb in our cloth, take it off at once!”

To which the first monk turned and replied:

“My brother, I put down the woman back at the riverbank after we crossed it, why are you carrying her still?”

The Great Equalizer

On Monday, 10 May 2010, the people of the Philippines will again exercise the right and the privilege of suffrage- the political franchise that embodies the idea that the people, under one government, shall have a voice in selecting the leaders and the representatives that will hold authority and exercise control and administration of the political machinery of that sovereign state in the far east.

It is thus high time for me to at least share a few of my thoughts on some of the most basic aspects of democracy, and hope that every filipino realizes the very importance of not only choosing their leaders, but of choosing their leaders well.

First off, do realize that in democracy, it is not the government that keeps the country’s economy in shape- it is the private sector, the business people, the working individual. The taxes paid by these entities hold up the economic architecture of the country, while the government does its job well (or rather too well) of trying to spend all of these revenues, all for the grandest intentions of public service.

Ask yourself now, why are there so many people in the public sector? The government is seen by many as a very stable employer, once you got in, you are insured of your livelihood for life, and sometimes even for the afterlife (“ghost employees”?). You get a good enough salary, with taxes practically lower than the amount you spend on cigarretes for a week. You ride with the wind and wait for retirement and then enjoy a good enough pension, a tribute for spending your whole life in service to the public.

Don’t get me wrong. Government employees are heroes in their own right, and there are many that is there for their genuine desire to help their fellowmen. It is the “system” and the “methods” used to run that system that needs retooling, not the people. Consider these points:

1. Hiring too many people in the government service is counter-productive to the economy. Of course, they generate more jobs (and more votes), but hey, if the government saves enough money not paying salaries and benefits to twenty people holding different positions but otherwise having the same job description, we could build more roads to help the farmers get their produce to the market at the least cost, thereby bringing down the prices of basic commodities;

2. Instead of over-taxing the business sector, why not create initiatives that make their businesses profitable and enable them to grow and invest more in the country, thus generating more “real” jobs and enhancing the revenue generating capacity of the government. Why should the government need to employ 100 people that contribute 1 peso in taxes, when it can create better employment opportunities for the same 100 people, who can now shell out 10 pesos for the national coffers?

Second, in democracy, it is said that the rich grow richer and the poor grow poorer. I beg to disagree. What is really happening is that the rich grow richer faster than the poor grow richer. Everybody is getting richer, what with all the things that the poor can afford now compared to what the poor can afford 30 years ago, it is the gap between the rich and the poor that is really widening, and it is a natural progression of development. If everyone is rich, who will work for each other? if everyone is poor, who will invest and give work opportunities for each other? the key is to find the balance between the two and make it possible for interdependence.

The government must make education world-class and at the same time affordable for everybody. Institute Financial Aid Programs and give everybody the chance to get a good education. Use tax money to improve schools. Stop with the “poor but deserving” nonsense! Everybody should have access to quality education, the rich and the poor alike. It is a fact that a good education almost always lead to good jobs, so educate the children. Stop the profiling between the intelligent and the dumb, we all know there is no such thing. The ones good in math become engineers, the ones not too good become construction workers- the former cannot succeed without the latter, as much as the latter cannot survive without the former. The trick is to educate the construction workers, give them the technical know-how that make them very good workers and help the engineers attain their goals. In turn, the engineers keep them employed, raise their salaries and they keep their families fed. Interdependence, through quality and affordable education.

Third, in democracy, the great equalizer is the citizen’s right of suffrage.

The vote of the fisherman is just the same as the vote of the ship captain. The vote of the jeepney driver is just as equal as the vote of the pilot. The vote of the beggar or the janitor is just as powerful as the vote of a Corporate CEO or the vote of the President. Each is entitled to only one vote.

So, think deep and think long. Don’t just hitch a ride on the bandwagon. Exercise your right, it is the only time that you are at par with everybody else. Vote for what you believe in, not for what others want you to believe. Be aware of everything that is happening around you, get involved.

Don’t sell your vote- and i don’t just mean selling it for money. Choose according to your mind, not according to your heart. Emotions almost always cloud rational thinking, and you cannot afford committing a mistake at the rare time that you are given the opportunity to decide for your and your family’s destiny in the country you call your home.

This rare time has come before us now, on Monday, the time of the Great Equalizer.

The Transcendent Self

Thinkers are divided into two sects, materialists and idealists. The first founding on experience, the second, consciousness, the first beginning to think from the data of the senses, the second perceive that the sense are not final. The materialists insist on facts, on history, on the force of circumstances and the animal wants of man. The idealists insist on the power of thought and of will, on inspiration, on miracle, on individual culture. However, every materialist will be an idealist; but an idealist can never go backward to be a materialist.

In the order of thought, the materialist takes his departure from the external world, and esteems a man as one product of that. The idealist takes his departure from his consciousness, and reckons the world as an appearance. The materialist expects sensible masses, society, government, social art and luxury, establishments, masses, social actions, etc. The idealist respects only what is metaphysical, the rank which things themselves take in his consciousness; not at all size or appearance. Mind is the only reality, of which man and all other natures are better or worse reflectors. For an idealist, nature, literature and history are only subjective phenomena. He does not respect labor, or the products of labor. He does not respect government except as far as it reiterates the law of this mind; nor the church, nor charities, nor arts but hears, as at a vast distance, what they say.

His ethics: it is simpler to be self-dependent. The height, the deity of man is to be self-sustained, to need no gift, no foreign force. Everything real is self-existent. Everything divine shares the self-existence of the Deity. All that one calls the world is the shadow of that substance which one is, the perpetual creation of the powers of thought.

The transcendentalist adopts the whole connection of spiritual doctrine. He believes in miracle, in the perpetual openness of the human mind to new influx of light and power; he believes in inspiration and in ecstasy. He wishes that the spiritual principle should be suffered to demonstrate itself to the end, in all possible applications to the state of man, without admission of anything unspiritual. Thus, the spiritual measure of inspiration is the depth of the thought.

The Divine Millieu

To have access to the divine milieu is to have found the One Thing needful: Him who burns by setting fire everything that man would love badly or not enough; Him who calms by eclipsing with his blaze everything that man would love too much; Him who consoles by gathering up everything that has been snatched from man’s love or has never given to it. To reach those priceless layers is to experience, with equal truth, that one has need of everything, and that one has need of nothing.

Everything is needed because the world will never be large enough to provide man’s taste for action with the means of grasping God, or his thirst for the possibility of being invaded by Him. And nothing is needed for as the only reality, which can satisfy him, lies beyond the transparencies with which it is mirrored, everything that fades and dies between him and his fellowmen and it will only serve to give reality back to them with greater purity.

Everything means both everything and nothing; everything is God and everything is dust: that is what man can say with equal truth, in accord with how divine ray falls.

The World As Will And Representation

The will constitutes the inner, true and indestructible nature of man, but is itself without consciousness. Consciousness is conditioned by the intellect and is a function of the brain.

Self-consciousness contains a knower and a known. It could not exist if there were not in it a known opposed to the knower and vice versa. Consciousness that is pure intelligence is impossible. In self-consciousness, the known- the will, must be the first and original thing; the knower, on the other hand, is only secondary.

Consciousness is known positively as a property of animal nature. Its foundation is the immediate awareness of a longing and of its alternate satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Thus, in the case of an animal, the immediate awareness of its satisfied or unsatisfied desire constitutes the principal part of its consciousness. The human being, however, has a consciousness that nevertheless remains continuously and predominantly concerned and engrossed with representations and ideas.

The will itself is without knowledge but the understanding associated with it is without will. The will behaves like a body that is moved, the understanding like the causes that set it in motion since it is the medium of motives. The primacy of the will is clear when it becomes controlled by the intellect.

But the will grows tired; the will is untiring. All knowing is associated with effort and exertion; willing is man’s very nature, whose manifestations occur without any weariness. It is strongly excited, active, unbidden and of its own accord, it never ceases to will. The intellect is a mere function of the brain, which therefore precedes it just as the stomach precedes digestion and becomes exhausted in old age.